
That is, I understood on an intellectual level why the book was funny - a dopey 17 year orphan in WA becomes a bushranger with the help of his talking cat, horse, cockatoo & cow. It was a non-stop comedy of errors and silliness.
As an adult I now understand exactly why this book didn't appeal to me back then - the talking animals!
I seriously disliked talking animal stories, especially if the talking animals talked to humans.

I've come to love stories like Winnie the Pooh thanks to the language and humour.
But I still couldn't read The Knife of Never Letting Go. As soon as the dog started talking, I was out of there!
And, sadly, the same thing has happened during my reread of Midnite.
I had forgotten the story completely, except that it was funny and about a bumbling bushranger.
That unusual sound you heard two nights ago was me groaning out loud when at the bottom of pg 2, Khat, the Siamese cat, started talking to young Midnite!
Then it all came flooding back. The memories of sitting in class and pretending to laugh when everyone else laughed & being grateful for the first time ever about the slimness of a book!
Midnite can be seen as a precursor to the Andy Griffiths school of humour. Perfect for the 10+ reader who likes lots of silliness and outrageous events.
It won the 'highly commended' CBCA award the year I was born - 1968. It was Randolph Stow's (1935 - 2010) one & only children's book.
Don't let my review put you off - there's a lot about this book that is endearing and funny; it's just not for me.
That brings back memories! I am helpless in the face of a talking cat - I don't know why I find it so easy to think that's normal! ;-) I hadn't thought about this book for years, but I am going to find a copy for my oldest niece (10) now.
ReplyDeleteI somehow feel at fault for not liking talking animal stories!
DeleteI've missed so many well-loved classics like Alice in Wonderland and Wind in the Willows because the talking animals put me off.
It must be a genetic flaw or an imagination block :-)