Monday, 25 March 2019

Musings of a Very Idle Reader

One of the reasons I love readalongs is how they help me to get through a challenging book. They keep me focused and give my reading a purpose. The support of my fellow readalongers is an integral part of the process. But sadly, none of this is helping me get through Don Quixote.


It reminds me of my attempts to read Catch-22. The humour is amusing and clever to start with, but by the the half way mark (if not before), it just becomes tedious in it's repetitiveness. So many of my good friends LOVE Catch-22 and so many of my blogger friends LOVE Don Quixote along with a large number of authors that I respect and admire. What have I missed with both of these books?

I like to think that I'm an intelligent person, who is reasonably well-read and not afraid to tackle some of the heftier books when the mood strikes. So I saw the satire and the cleverness in both books, I appreciated the intentions of the authors, I enjoyed some of the set pieces and the themes but, ultimately, they didn't move me, engage me or entertain me. They left me scratching my head in bemusement.

With Don Quixote, I kept waiting for something different to happen, for some growth or insight. It never happened - well it certainly didn't happen in Part One.

I had heard that Part Two was a better read, with all sorts of exciting 'pre-post-modern metafiction'so imagine my disappointment when I quickly discovered that it was more of the same, but with parody...and more even poems!

The whole time I was reading DQ, I kept seeing and hearing The Cisco Kid and Pancho - the characters from a 1950's TV show that I watched in reruns during my 70's childhood. Every time Quixote said Sancho's name I heard Cisco's famous "ohhhh Paaaaaancho" in my head instead!

Just like the TV western, Don Quixote is episodic and full of copious amounts of frame stories...not my favourite form of literature. Perhaps I should have read one chapter a week, spinning each episode out with an anticipatory break in between?

I enjoyed the brief glimpses into life in rural Spain and watching the very first odd-couple literary pairing in action. But I failed to find much humour - there was ridiculousness and absurdity and some slap-stick, but nothing to laugh out loud about. Don Quixote was sad and mad, and Sancho ignorant and trusting, not figures I could poke fun at, or find it amusing to see others do so.

So reluctantly, and with some regret, I abandon the readalong and leave Don Quixote and Sancho to continue riding around the Spanish countryside in search of adventures and injustices to right. According to Goodreads, I made it to the 52% mark, which I think is giving it a fair go, in anyone's books!

Over the years, a number of authors have adapted elements of Don Quixote into their own work. These include Madame Bovary, The Idiot, The New York Trilogy and The Moor's Last Sigh. I attempted but did not like or finish Madame Bovary but I was sucked into Auster's mad, sad world in The New York Trilogy. I even read somewhere that Che Guevera modelled himself on the bumbling, grandiose idealistic knight as well!

Rushdie obviously loves it so much, he's having a second go at a Quixotic story. His new novel, due to published in September, is an even more obvious nod to his favourite novel, than the previous.
 The Jonathan Cape blurb says:

 Quichotte, an ageing travelling salesman obsessed with TV, is on a quest for love. Unfortunately, his daily diet of reality TV, sitcoms, films, soaps, comedies and dramas has distorted his ability to separate fantasy from reality. He wishes an imaginary son into existence, while obsessively writing love letters to a celebrity he knows only through his screen. Quuihotte's story is narrated by Brother, a mediocre spy novelist in the midst of a mid-life crisis, triggered in part by a fall-out with his Sister. As the stories of Brother and Quichotte ingeniously intertwine, Salmon Rushdie takes us ona wild, picaresque journey through a world on the edge of moral and spiritual collapse.

While The Bookseller, 8th March 2019, reveals that,
Quichotte tells the story of an ageing travelling salesman who falls in love with a TV star and sets off to drive across America on a quest to prove himself worthy of her hand. “Quichotte’stragicomic tale is one of a deranged time, and deals, along the way, with father–son relationships, sibling quarrels, racism, the opioid crisis, cyber-spies, and the end of the world.”

Rushdie has previously spoken of his enthusiasm for Cervantes’ Don Quixote, which was published in two parts in 1605 and 1615. 
In January 2018 he told the Guardian of his re-reading of the text: “On the one hand, the characters of Quixote and Sancho Panza are as beautifully realised as I remember them, and the idea of a man determinedly seeing the world according to his own vision, in spite of all evidence to the contrary, feels strikingly contemporary. 
“On the other hand, how many more times are the Knight of the Dolorous Countenance and Sancho going to get beaten up and left in pain in various roadside ditches? The ‘greatest novel ever written’ – I voted for it myself once – turns out to be just a little bit repetitive. To make the reading easier, I’m breaking it up and reading other books by other authors after every couple of hundred pages of Cervantes.


I was rather thrilled to read, that even though Rushdie voted this the best book of all time, he still considers it repetitive and difficult to read. Sadly, even though I unknowingly used Rushdie's approach of reading Quixote by reading other books in between, it only served to make me feel more and more reluctant to pick it up this monotonous tome each time.

Honoré Daumier

It's not to late for you though.

If my miserable failure should inspire you or goad you into trying for yourself, please visit Nick's blog for details around the chapter-a-day readalong or Silvia's blog to enjoy the company of someone who could read Don Quixote every year and never get tired of it.

My earlier, more hopeful, Quixote posts.
Musings of an Idle Reader
Marcela

I'll leave Don Quixote and Cervantes now, with little regret. My curiosity to experience the first modern novel remains unmet, or at least, unsatisfied.

Catching clouds would have been more amusing.

16 comments:

  1. I can sense you are a little disappointed by your response to DQ, but it is ok to walk away not appreciating it. You gave it an honest attempt, and that is what matters. It is a daunting novel to get through. I'm re-reading it right now and slogging through it -- unlike my initial read in which I devoured it. This time it is slow and tedious, although I still see the sarcasm and mockery, which are a bit entertaining. BTW, I could not finish Catch-22. I think I disposed of it b/c I honestly knew I would never give it another try.

    Thanks for sharing that bit about Quichotte...I've not read Rushdie, but I plan to read The Satanic Verses this year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the support Ruth. It's not easy to abandon a book that I've made a commitment to others to read. But the HUGE pile by and under my bed is calling my name! Including Rushdie's The Moor's Last Sigh.

      Delete
  2. I haven’t read DQ but really admire your willingness to give it a go. And I agree, getting to 52% before deciding it wasn’t for you was giving it every chance. Well done!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The relentless, repetitive nature of the story made me feel like I was reading the same story each time I picked it up!

      Delete
  3. I tend to tire of satire very quickly.
    I’ve read Catch 22 and wasn’t enamoured with it, but haven’t attempted Don Quixote because it just doesn’t interest me.

    Shelleyrae @ Book’d Out

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, satire is exhausting. The only one I remember enjoying was the very slim book The Loved Ones by Evelyn Waugh.

      Delete
  4. I have yet to attempt DQ, so I sympathize. And IMO, the first third of Catch-22 is great but after that you can leave it alone.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well that makes me feel better Jean. I've never actually finished Catch-22 although I've tried to read in 3 times.

      Delete
  5. I didn't much like Catch-22, which I agree is pretty puerile and not that funny, but did like Don Quixote. However, at 52%, you've given it a fair shake.

    I don't know about the Rushdie, et al., but I would say if I was going to read something to put me in the mood, I'd read Pickwick Papers or Tom Jones, both of which I think owe a lot to DQ and are fun. And I'll also say, though people I know like the Grossman translation, I first read it in the Motteux/Ozell (around 1700) and liked that better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the tip about the translation Reese, I did wonder if that was the problem...except everyone praised the Grossman version so much!

      Delete
  6. I like the idea of DQ but I'm not sure how much of it I've actually read - partly because there were abridged versions around when I was a kid.

    But Catch 22!? One of the great books of our time! The problem of course is that my time was significantly before yours. The book and more especially the movie were Events in the anti-War years. But I've read it recently and it still holds up IMO. Heller's next work was Something Happened - a close study of one man's life in marketing, after that I think he falls off. Still, I can't ask you to do more than give it a try, and you've done that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I have a couple of very good friends (abouot 10 yrs older than me) who read Catch-22 at school. It had the fortunate result of turning them in to HUGE fans of the book...which is why I've now tried to read the book 3 times. But every time, after enjoying the start, I just get bored by the repetitive rest. Maybe if I had studied it too...?

      Delete
  7. I'm Unknown again. I tried being wadholloway but it turned out I was actually a robot. Bill

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for persisting Bill! I'm not sure the departure of Google+ will make anything easier or not....Blogger certainly can't make it any harder (see today's post).

      Delete
  8. In high school, I read it with a teacher who loved it. I remember eagerly coming to the stories and reading them together and laughing about them every day.

    That must have been an abridgment. Maybe that is the way to go? I just finished North and South, and it mentioned in the notes section of the book that the author reordered the book when she published the material as a novel after originally publishing it in a serial form in the paper.

    So, why not? Why not find an excellent respected abridgment? I say that counts, too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Is a one page synopsis abridged enough :-D

      Everyone who loves DQ seems to have had a teacher that turned them on to the story. Maybe reading it aloud with someone who genuinely gets the humour and can bring it alive is the trick?

      Delete

I love hearing from you but I understand that blogger commenting can be a frustrating experience for many.

Make sure you're logged into your account before writing your comment (esp on mobile devices), otherwise blogger will eat it. I have occasionally found lost comments by hitting the back arrow button. Using a different browser for a while can also help.

All anonymous spam comments will be deleted and reported.

If all else fails, you can contact me on my fb page or twitter.